AlphaFold 3 & new free server released

There’s continuous developments in this space but I only post stuff that looks like it may be helpful or that appears to be a big deal. This one fits into the latter category: Evolutionary Scale · ESM3: Simulating 500 million years of evolution with a language model

You can just sign up and start using it

It seems like it would be good for some lab to have a budget for throwing out preconceived notions and purely focusing on what developments they could make just by using AI, and taking whatever breakthroughs are easiest to obtain using that to try to find a path to a cure. Because a lot of stuff that was impossible 6 months ago is now easy, and a lot of the stuff that seemed like it was close is still a long way off. So just working with what is available now seems like it would be worthwhile

Hi @bob,

Thanks again for highlighting these useful tools. I’m sure there are some bioinformatically-inclined @ScienceExperts that would be interested in using these models for their work.

It would be great to hear from scientists about their experiences with LLMs in their research!

TT

1 Like

In case anyone missed it: AI cracks superbug problem in two days that took scientists years

Google released a tool, which is currently restricted to invite-only, called co-scientist.

I think the HBV community could do with a researcher who is trying to cure HBV be tech first, and using these tools available.

If I were to bet on it, I would personally bet that the eventual cure (that works well as a functional cure for a high percentage of patients, as opposed to just getting approved) will likely come from someone who makes use of these AI related tools.

1 Like

Hi John. Just for fun I passed your query on to deep research in grok, and this is what it said. If you have any comments it’d be interesting to hear them:

Key Points

  • Modeling the initial interactions between the epsilon RNA stem loop and the HBV polymerase is feasible using computational methods.
  • The full binding process, involving conformational changes driven by HSP90 co-factors, is complex and currently beyond modeling capabilities.
  • The epsilon RNA stem loop’s structure is known, and specific parts like the internal bulge are crucial for binding.

Understanding the Binding

The epsilon RNA stem loop is part of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) and helps start viral replication by binding to the polymerase, specifically the reverse transcriptase (RT). This initial binding is essential, but the full process includes changes in the polymerase’s shape, driven by HSP90 co-factors, making it hard to model completely. However, focusing on the first interactions is possible and can give useful insights.

Feasibility of Modeling

Yes, we can model these initial interactions using computers. We know the structure of the epsilon RNA from studies using NMR spectroscopy (Solution structure of the apical stem-loop). While the polymerase’s structure isn’t fully known, we can use models based on similar proteins. Studies show the internal bulge and parts of the stems are key for binding, which helps guide these models.

Surprising Detail: Apical Loop Not Essential

It’s interesting that the apical loop, part of the epsilon stem loop, isn’t needed for the polymerase to bind, unlike what might be expected. Instead, other parts like the bulge are more critical, which changes how we think about the binding process.


Survey Note: Detailed Analysis of Epsilon RNA Stem Loop and Polymerase Binding

Introduction

The interaction between the epsilon RNA stem loop and the hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase is a critical step in viral replication, initiating the packaging of pregenomic RNA (pgRNA) and subsequent reverse transcription. This process is complex, involving conformational changes in the polymerase facilitated by host cell chaperones, particularly HSP90 co-factors. Given the dynamic nature of this interaction, modeling the entire binding reaction is challenging. However, focusing on the initial interactions offers a feasible approach for understanding this molecular mechanism, as evidenced by ongoing research efforts.

Structure and Function of Epsilon RNA Stem Loop

The epsilon RNA stem loop is a cis-acting regulatory element located at the 5’ end of the HBV pgRNA, essential for viral replication. Structural studies, primarily using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, have elucidated its conformation. The apical stem-loop, a key component, consists of a 27-nucleotide sequence forming a UGU triloop with a CG closing base pair and a bulged-out cytosine, as detailed in Solution structure of the apical stem-loop of the human hepatitis B virus encapsidation signal. The overall epsilon structure includes a lower stem, a bulge region, an upper stem, and a tri-loop, with the internal bulge being particularly significant for polymerase interaction.

Polymerase and Its Interaction with Epsilon

The HBV polymerase, specifically the reverse transcriptase (RT), comprises several domains: a terminal protein (TP) domain, a spacer domain, an RT domain, and an RNase H domain. The RT binds to epsilon to initiate replication, a process dependent on the cellular heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) chaperone system for activation, as noted in Hepatitis B virus reverse transcriptase and epsilon RNA sequences required for specific interaction in vitro. This interaction triggers pgRNA packaging and protein-primed reverse transcription, crucial for viral genome synthesis.

Key Interaction Sites

Research has identified specific RNA sequences within epsilon critical for RT binding. The internal bulge, particularly the first nucleotide cytosine, is essential, along with sequences from the upper portion of the lower stem, the lower portion of the upper stem, and a single unpaired uridine residue in the upper stem [3]. Surprisingly, the apical loop, traditionally thought to be involved, is dispensable for RT binding, focusing attention on the stem regions and bulge for initial interactions.

Challenges in Modeling

Modeling the full binding reaction is complicated by the conformational changes in the polymerase, actively driven by HSP90 co-factors. These dynamics suggest that the RT must adopt a specific activated state for binding, which is not fully understood due to the lack of high-resolution structural data for the RT. Current studies indicate no available structures for the HBV RT-epsilon complex, with only homology models proposed for the RT domain Hepatitis B Virus Epsilon (ε) RNA Element: Dynamic Regulator of Viral Replication and Attractive Therapeutic Target.

Feasibility of Modeling Initial Interactions

Despite these challenges, modeling the initial interactions is feasible. The known structure of epsilon, combined with homology models of RT, allows for computational approaches such as molecular docking. These models can be guided by mutagenesis data identifying critical binding sites, as seen in Hepatitis B virus reverse transcriptase and epsilon RNA sequences required for specific interaction in vitro. Such methods can simulate how RT recognizes and binds to the bulge and stem regions of epsilon, providing meaningful insights into the initial contact points.

Comparative Analysis of Modeling Approaches

To illustrate the potential, consider the following table comparing modeling strategies:

Approach Description Advantages Limitations
Molecular Docking Docks epsilon RNA to RT model using known interaction sites Identifies potential binding interfaces Relies on RT homology model accuracy
Molecular Dynamics (MD) Simulates RT-epsilon dynamics over time, considering flexibility Captures dynamic interactions Computationally intensive, requires RT structure
NMR-Guided Modeling Uses NMR data for epsilon to constrain docking models High accuracy for RNA structure Lacks RT structure, limits complex modeling

This table highlights that while molecular docking is a practical starting point, integrating dynamics through MD could enhance understanding, albeit with computational demands.

Role of HSP90 and Conformational Changes

The user’s mention of HSP90 co-factors underscores the active process involving conformational changes. In vitro studies have shown that HSP90 is necessary to activate recombinant RT for specific epsilon binding, suggesting that the initial interaction may occur with RT in a chaperone-induced state. This adds complexity, as modeling must account for this activated conformation, potentially using comparative models from related systems.

Current Research and Future Directions

The user’s reference to their postdoc, Razia, working on initial interactions aligns with the feasibility of this approach. Current research, such as Conformational Dynamics of the Hepatitis B Virus Pre-genomic RNA on Multiple Time Scales: Implications for Viral Replication, emphasizes RNA dynamics’ role in epsilon-P interaction, suggesting that modeling should consider these dynamics. Future advancements may involve integrating experimental data like cross-linking or advanced NMR to refine models, potentially bridging the gap to full process modeling.

Conclusion

In summary, while the complete modeling of the epsilon RNA stem loop binding to the polymerase, including conformational changes, remains challenging, focusing on initial interactions is within current capabilities. This involves leveraging known epsilon structures, RT homology models, and computational docking guided by interaction data. This approach can yield valuable insights, supporting ongoing research efforts like Razia’s, and pave the way for targeted antiviral strategies.

Key Citations

Thanks for this!

Unfortunately, the primary premise of the AI generated response is wrong. Yes, you can dock epsilon to the polymerase (we’ve done that), but the docking is clearly wrong as it makes no biological sense and does not reflect the biological data that my lab and others have generated. AI always needs to be treated skeptically as it tends to hallucinate things often.

John.

3 Likes